TV Funnier than Movies?
Hi kids, thanks to a mysterious pain of the abdomen that may or may not be chronic appendicitis, I’ve been sitting on the couch watching television and the occasional movie for three weeks straight. And I’ve started to ask myself a seemingly blasphemous question. Sorry to get all “Tifaux Quarterly” on you, but is television funnier than film? I decided a long time ago that I wanted to make movies, and I wanted them to be funny. But lately I’ve been coming up against this problem: where do I go for inspiration? And the answer these days is television. Arrested Development (R.I.P.(?)) The Office, The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, even The Simpsons from time to time, are where interesting comedy is happening. Look at the past year’s theatrical comedy releases and you see a bit of a wasteland. Sure the hits like 40 Year Old Virgin and Wedding Crashers were funny, but there was nothing particularly special or interesting about them. They were just fun and raunchy. Probably the best comedy film released last year was The Aristocrats which has the special distinction of being nearly impossible to show on television. It was a truly hilarious and introspective look at the art of joke telling. I left that theater feeling like I had learned something.
And I guess that’s what it comes down to. I don’t learn anything from funny movies these days. I learn a lot from Arrested Development. The art of the callback was never used so well. Forget about the rule of three, those guys taught me the rule of 30.

But you can’t pull off something like that in a film. There’s a freedom of experimentation that you get when you have over 8 hours of time to work with these characters every year for many years (if you’re lucky). The complexity of the situations can play out over a much longer period of time, which can lead to better and more excruciating forms of embarrassment. Of course you can get to a point where the situations are bled dry (The Simpsons, I’m looking in your direction) and at that point it’s best to throw in the towel. The British almost get it right with their limited series, but they’re often too restrictive. I would love to have twice as much of Basil Fawlty even though it probably would have killed John Cleese. Something like the three(ish) seasons that Arrested Development had is a nice balance.
But you can’t make an 8 hour comedy film. That would suck. You have 90-120 minutes in a comedy to set up your situations and play them out. The answer to that problem ought to be sequels right? If television just gets better as the series continues (until it peaks and gets stale after the writers exhaust their ideas or bow to network pressure to finally get those crazy kids in bed) why is it so hard to make a good sequel to a funny movie? I can’t think of any great comedy sequels since After the Thin Man. Or God forbid great TV shows adapted from movies. Actually there is one. Buffy The Vampire Slayer. But Party Girl the series? Ferris Bueller the series? My Big Fat Greek Life? (ok, bad example since it was adapted from a terrible movie whose success only proves my point) obviously disasters from the start. Oh, and M*A*S*H (the series) is allegedly hilarious, but I didn’t grow up in the 70s and I’ve never really understood it.
Maybe this is on my mind because when I stop being sick I’m going back to work on what I think will be a great sequel, Hal Hartley’s Fay Grim which is a sequel to his 1997 film Henry Fool. It’s made for the right reasons, which is unusual for a sequel. It’s not about cashing in on the (modest) success of the original, it’s about exploring the characters further and telling an interesting story. You don’t even need to have seen Henry Fool to enjoy Fay Grim but you enjoy it even more if you have. It’s not really a comedy, but the funny parts do tend to come from Hal’s (and the audience’s) deep familiarity with the characters.
So what’s wrong with comic filmmakers these days? Where’s our new Woody Allen? Where’s our old Woody Allen for that matter? I refuse to believe that guy doesn’t have another incredible comedy like Manhattan or Bullets Over Broadway in him. Even the Coen brothers have disappointed lately. The giants of film comedy are letting me down. Spike Jonze and Michel Gondry have done some great stuff with Charlie Kaufman’s screenplays, and I’m still holding out for Judd Apatow or Mike White’s film masterpiece. And David O. Russell is on his way too. But I don’t see the breadth of talent that I see almost every night on TV.
Since this is a TV blog I figure our readers are probably already on board with this idea, but I want to ask the question to you anyway. Is there something I’m missing? Are the great comedy films out there but I’m just not going to the right film festivals? The film festivals I go to are dominated by angst. Where’s the funny?
1 comment March 23rd, 2006


