<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disappointment vs. um&#8230; appointment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/</link>
	<description>A television blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:39:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rebain</title>
		<link>http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/comment-page-1/#comment-13986</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rebain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/#comment-13986</guid>
		<description>I pretty much avoided just about any word concerning the new shows so I had next to zero expectations for all of them.  Pushing Daisies is the obvious winner in terms of best new show, and I would probably put Chuck just above the borderline towards awsome.  I find Big Bang Theory funny in spite of Kaley Cuoco, but my biggest surprise is Cavemen which I find laugh out loud funny.  In terms of returning shows I would probably agree with the placements here of 30 Rock, Heroes and the Office.  Oh, and I find the lead on Moonlight hot, so there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pretty much avoided just about any word concerning the new shows so I had next to zero expectations for all of them.  Pushing Daisies is the obvious winner in terms of best new show, and I would probably put Chuck just above the borderline towards awsome.  I find Big Bang Theory funny in spite of Kaley Cuoco, but my biggest surprise is Cavemen which I find laugh out loud funny.  In terms of returning shows I would probably agree with the placements here of 30 Rock, Heroes and the Office.  Oh, and I find the lead on Moonlight hot, so there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom the Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/comment-page-1/#comment-13935</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom the Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 07:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/#comment-13935</guid>
		<description>I love this idea. A lot of placements are dead on with my assessments, especially Bionic Woman (what a bitter, bitter disappointment).

Right now, I&#039;d put Heroes in the lower half of the chart; the opening of this season has been painfully bad. I&#039;d put Back To You way in the lower right corner -- I was expecting bad, and it&#039;s so far worse. And, suprisingly, I&#039;d put Big Bang Theory up in the upper left quadrant with Samantha Who? -- two shows I thought would be awful, but I&#039;m enjoying a great deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this idea. A lot of placements are dead on with my assessments, especially Bionic Woman (what a bitter, bitter disappointment).</p>
<p>Right now, I&#8217;d put Heroes in the lower half of the chart; the opening of this season has been painfully bad. I&#8217;d put Back To You way in the lower right corner &#8212; I was expecting bad, and it&#8217;s so far worse. And, suprisingly, I&#8217;d put Big Bang Theory up in the upper left quadrant with Samantha Who? &#8212; two shows I thought would be awful, but I&#8217;m enjoying a great deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: procrastinator</title>
		<link>http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/comment-page-1/#comment-13928</link>
		<dc:creator>procrastinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 03:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/#comment-13928</guid>
		<description>Love the chart! I would rate Chuck way higher, I think it&#039;s better than Reaper. And Cane would def be below the line for me. And really high expectations for Viva Lauglin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the chart! I would rate Chuck way higher, I think it&#8217;s better than Reaper. And Cane would def be below the line for me. And really high expectations for Viva Lauglin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aleks</title>
		<link>http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/comment-page-1/#comment-13916</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/#comment-13916</guid>
		<description>I would give Samantha Who? a small bump leftwards and upwards only because I completely expected it to be terrible when its actually kind of good. I felt the opposite for Chuck: I thought it would be good, but it&#039;s actually pretty terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would give Samantha Who? a small bump leftwards and upwards only because I completely expected it to be terrible when its actually kind of good. I felt the opposite for Chuck: I thought it would be good, but it&#8217;s actually pretty terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/comment-page-1/#comment-13903</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/#comment-13903</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d bump The Office up a little higher, although yesterday&#039;s episode wasn&#039;t quite as sharp. Elsewise, everything looks good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d bump The Office up a little higher, although yesterday&#8217;s episode wasn&#8217;t quite as sharp. Elsewise, everything looks good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/comment-page-1/#comment-13890</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/#comment-13890</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d trade Reaper and Chuck, personally. Man, looking at that graph just shows how few pleasant surprises there were this season! Sure, there were some shows that we expected to be good, and were, in fact, good, but many more disappointments than shows with low expectations turning out well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d trade Reaper and Chuck, personally. Man, looking at that graph just shows how few pleasant surprises there were this season! Sure, there were some shows that we expected to be good, and were, in fact, good, but many more disappointments than shows with low expectations turning out well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie's dad</title>
		<link>http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/comment-page-1/#comment-13880</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie's dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tifaux.com/2007/10/26/disappointment-vs-um-appointment/#comment-13880</guid>
		<description>I might switch Reaper and Dirty Sexy Money, but otherwise, &#039;Right on, Son!&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might switch Reaper and Dirty Sexy Money, but otherwise, &#8216;Right on, Son!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

