<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heaven in a documentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tifaux.com/2008/02/14/heaven-in-a-documentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tifaux.com/2008/02/14/heaven-in-a-documentary/</link>
	<description>A television blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:05:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sapphrodite</title>
		<link>http://www.tifaux.com/2008/02/14/heaven-in-a-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-28105</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tifaux.com/2008/02/14/heaven-in-a-documentary/#comment-28105</guid>
		<description>Watched the Documentary in its entirety... (BTW, this film airs again on Sat Feb.23rd @ 4am and 9am on CBC NewsWorld&#039;s &#039;The Lens&#039;, for anyone who missed it).

Seems to be missing a lot of the broad spectrum of bisexuality, and seemed to focus on the single, straight-oriented, bi / bi-curious female, and didn&#039;t really go into any equivalent depth regarding male bisexuality, female bisexuals who are married or moms (spouses / restrictions / &#039;double life&#039;), straight oriented vs gay oriented of either gender, or polyamory.

Certainly not critical, because the film was well-executed within its scope, but it kinda left me feeling like it was a mainstream, publically palatable version of bisexuality that wouldn&#039;t offend the general CBC NewsWorld viewing audience.

Just my two cents....  thanks.
~Sapphy~  =^_^=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watched the Documentary in its entirety&#8230; (BTW, this film airs again on Sat Feb.23rd @ 4am and 9am on CBC NewsWorld&#8217;s &#8216;The Lens&#8217;, for anyone who missed it).</p>
<p>Seems to be missing a lot of the broad spectrum of bisexuality, and seemed to focus on the single, straight-oriented, bi / bi-curious female, and didn&#8217;t really go into any equivalent depth regarding male bisexuality, female bisexuals who are married or moms (spouses / restrictions / &#8216;double life&#8217;), straight oriented vs gay oriented of either gender, or polyamory.</p>
<p>Certainly not critical, because the film was well-executed within its scope, but it kinda left me feeling like it was a mainstream, publically palatable version of bisexuality that wouldn&#8217;t offend the general CBC NewsWorld viewing audience.</p>
<p>Just my two cents&#8230;.  thanks.<br />
~Sapphy~  =^_^=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
