In defense of 30 Rock

Posted by Dan May 9th, 2008 at 02:04pm In 30 Rock

USA Today. I can’t say I would ever go to you for reputable cultural or artistic criticism.

Case in point, this review of 30 Rock.

Were numbers the only problem, Rock fans might be able to relax. The show, after all, has already been renewed for next season. But since the strike, this once-dependable sitcom has also lost its way creatively, ditching plot and character in a desperate, scattershot search for laughs, as if its new goal were to become a live-action version of Family Guy.

Certainly, that’s the approach taken in tonight’s hectic finale. On the plus side, it does yield some funny moments from Alec Baldwin, Jack McBrayer and Matthew Broderick as a Bush official who is desperate to join the ranks of the unemployed. (Even those who dislike the administration, however, may not want to see a network sitcom go so far out of its way to mock it.)

But as often happens lately, the jokes come at the expense of our attachment to the characters and to the show’s fraying links to reality.

Liz doesn’t have to be sane, but when she’s as unstable as the nuts circling around her, you get a show that plays more like a barely related series of sketches than a sitcom.

It’s possible that 30 Rock is trying to learn from the failure of Studio 60, which took the efforts involved in producing comedy too seriously. But as is so often the case in life and art, one can also fail by moving too far in the other direction. If the show she’s writing doesn’t matter, then there’s nothing at risk for Liz — and no reason for us to care about Jack’s efforts to mentor her, which were once 30 Rock’s best asset.

A few things:

  1. Doesn’t everyone want to see the Bush administration mocked?
  2. Aren’t the show’s “fraying links to reality” what makes the show fun?
  3. I feel like the Family Guy analogy isn’t apt. It’s more like The Simpsons — chock full of non sequiturs, subtle jokes that only make sense if you are really paying attention and non-verbal jokes that you only pick up on during repeated views. However, it always comes back to the main plot.
  4. Boo!

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Vance  |  May 9th, 2008 at 3:24 pm

    Okay yay! Someone on my side! I saw that article too and just thought it was a debbie downer article for a reason to bitch.

    I like my bitching and maybe I’m wearing my rose coloured glasses too closely but all the complaints about 30 Rock are so overated. Usually I can see some validity but it didn’t even occur to me that 30 Rock hasn’t been good lately.

    (Almost ditto about Ugly Betty and complaints about that).

    (Then again, I also liked Glory Days, the biggest tanker to hit Broadway since the 80’s so who am I to say? Apparently I love everything!)

  • 2. jesse  |  May 12th, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    Bianco is a pretty hard-core traditionalist by culture-writer standards. He seems to resist anything really offbeat or with a hardcore cult following. I recall his support of Veronica Mars was waivering/cautious at best, and he was pretty slow to get on The Office train (if he ever did). And he’s a Two and a Half Men fan — which I guess counts as realistic because it’s as lame as watching guys you could meet in real life? I don’t know.

    There’s a certain number of TV writers — usually not bloggers, it should be said — who get really into that; they also seem to take a lot of stock in TV that a lot of people can enjoy, even if it’s crap. This leads to things like taking Grey’s Anatomy seriously. And assuming that even non-supporters of Bush would think 30 Rock goes too far (zer?!).

    Your point about Simpsons moreso than Family Guy is dead-on. Family Guy looks for ways to be “random” and/or offensive. The Simpsons (at their best) and 30 Rock writers just find the best damn joke. Knocking 30 Rock for not really being about The Girlie Show is like knocking The Simpsons for having episodes about the other residents of Springfield.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

May 2008
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Recent Posts